Study: Local CEOs overpaid for performance compared to elsewhere
The CEOs of top performing local public companies received much bigger pay raises in 2009 than the CEOs of top performing companies in 10 major cities nationwide, according a new study.
The study by BDO USA LLP, a professional services firm, looked at the relationship between the change in total CEO compensation (including salary, bonus, stock options, etc.) between 2008 and 2009 and the total shareholder return of the company over the same year.
It found that the 25 top performing D.C.-area companies posted a median increase in shareholder returns of 85 percent, significantly lower than the median for top performing companies nationwide of 98 percent. Yet the CEOs of those local companies got a 37 percent increase in compensation, compared to just a 5.5 percent increase for CEOs of top performing companies nationwide. Local CEO pay hikes were second only to those of Atlanta CEOs, who received a 45 percent bump in compensation.
The CEOs at the 25 worst-performing public companies in the D.C. area also fared a bit better than their under-performing brethren nationwide.
Shareholder returns at the lowest-performing local companies decreased by a median of 5 percent, while their CEOs took a 4 percent pay cut — equivalent to 80 percent of the decline in shareholder returns. Nationally, the bottom-performing companies saw shareholder returns drop 10.5 percent, while CEO pay fell 9 percent — equivalent to 86 percent of the decline in shareholder returns. This means local under-performing CEOs didn’t receive as big a pay cut, relative to their performance, as underperforming CEOs nationwide.
“Tying pay to company performance is critical now more than ever given the increased scrutiny both from regulators and shareholders,” said Randy Ramirez, Northeast regional leader of the compensation and benefits practice at BDO in a statement. “Our analysis shows that top performing companies in Washington, D.C., are more rigorous than their poor performing counterparts when it comes to developing a performance-based strategy for CEO compensation. However, there are still some notable gaps. Performance cycles do not coincide with changes in company tactics and performance measures do not accurately reflect changes in operational focus.”
The Washington Business Journal conducted a smaller compensation study in May which found that CEO compensation at local financial services companies declined 39 percent in 2009, despite an improvement in company performance.
Here are the breakdowns on CEO pay for performance at companies in the 10 largest cities nationwide, according to the BDO study:
Top 25 performing companies
City / shareholder return / CEO pay increases
- New York / 243 percent / 10 percent
- San Francisco / 155 percent / -14 percent
- Houston / 152 percent / 5 percent
- Dallas / 135 percent / 6 percent
- Miami / 109 percent / 2 percent
- Boston / 86 percent / 1 percent
- D.C. / 85 percent / 37 percent
- Atlanta / 74 percent / 45 percent
- Chicago / 63 percent / 4 percent
- Los Angeles / 58 percent / 10 percent
Bottom 25 performing companies
City / shareholder return /CEO pay increases
- San Francisco / 4 percent / -9 percent
- Miami / -1 percent / 0 percent
- D.C. / -5 percent / -4 percent
- Atlanta / -7 percent / -25 percent
- Chicago / -10 percent / -9 percent
- LA / -11percent / 2 percent
- Dallas / -13 percent / 0 percent
- Boston / -13 percent / -10 percent
- Houston / -19 percent / -10 percent
- New York / -27 percent / -17 percent
Apply for our overnight online cash advance loans from $100 to $2500, deposited instantly in your bank account.